What are you Looking for?
What are you Looking for?
What are you Looking for?
The Solvency II taxonomy has been updated and this means that reports from reference date 31-12-2019 should be reported with taxonomy version 2.4.0.
The biggest changes are found in Sheets S.26.01 and S.27.01. Furthermore there are a couple of new tables in S.25.01, S.25.03, S.26.01, S.26.07 and S.27.01.
We have updated our template by creating it straight from the presentation documents in the taxonomy itself, instead of using the EIOPA template. We did this to be less dependent on EIOPA creating the template. This means that the lay-out of the file changed a bit:
It is still possible to import the values and formulas from older Excel templates or XBRL files. Please let us know if you have any questions regarding the new taxonomy or new template
Template update Solvency II
Version 2.4.0 Insurance is found on this link.
Support
For any support-questions we prefer to receive your specified question, including the issued Excel-template, in our inbox support@parseport.com.
Updates to ParsePort Banking Templates The final release of the CRD IV 2.9.1 taxonomy has been published and this means that reports in 2020 need to be created with the 2.9.1 version. The reference dates differ between the different kinds of reports: Package 2.9 RESOL to apply from 31/12/2019 Package
Updates to ParsePort Insurance Templates The Solvency II taxonomy has been updated and this means that reports from reference date 31-12-2019 should be reported with taxonomy version 2.4.0. The changes between taxonomy version 2.3.0 and 2.4.0 can be downloaded in an excel sheet on this link. The biggest changes are
Possibilities of non-numeric data in XBRL Now that ESMA requires stock exchange companies to report in iXBRL, there has been some discussion in the Netherlands regarding the filing of annual reports by large companies that are not listed. The listed companies only have to report the consolidated figures in XBRL;
Why Denmark is leading within XBRL I see four reasons why Denmark is one of the leading nations within XBRL, let me explain; 1. Political backup From the very beginning, there has been an ambition and strategy from Danish authorities that XBRL should be a fixed standard in the future
The Impact Of The Letter “i” While several European countries successfully adopted XBRL for financial statements, a new version is already lingering on the horizon. From reporting year 2020, stock exchange companies within the European Union are required to report their financial statements using the ESEF XBRL taxonomy. Instead of
A consistent presentation of XBRL instances The EBA and the EIOPA have been accepting XBRL files for several years now for CRD IV and Solvency II reports. For authorities, XBRL is a giant leap forwards compared to Excel files, since XBRL can process data way more efficient than they ever
